Weird thing on Spivak's definition of ordered pairs

 In the appendix of the third chapter of Spivak's Calculus, on case 1 of his definition of ordered pairs he admits that (1, 1) = {1} (from the way sets are defined).

I don't get it. That is not a pair. What am I missing?


Popular posts from this blog

JIT and GIL removal are not even my most anticipated Python 3.13 features

An interview with Steve Wozniak by Jessica Livingston cured my AI anxiety

What if regular exercise is the best cognitive exercise?